Acute Myopic Shift after a Single Dose of Acetazolamide: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

We report the case of a 32-year-old male who presented with an acute myopic shift as a result of uveal effusion following a single administration of 250 mg acetazolamide. The drug was discontinued and following cycloplegia and topical steroid therapy, we observed progressive deepening of the anterior chamber, reopening of the iridocorneal angle, and complete resolution of the myopic shift after 5 days. A literature review since 1956 identified 23 cases, including ours, which developed a myopic shift after a median time of 24 h (3 - 24) following a median dose of 500 mg (125 - 1000) acetazolamide, with about a third complicated by angle closure ocular hypertension. This presumed idiosyncratic reaction can occur without prior drug exposure and independent of the phakic status. Treatment options include systematic drug withdrawal associated with cycloplegia, anti-glaucomatous agents, and/or corticosteroids. Full recovery is achieved within about 5 days (2 - 14). Given the widespread use of acetazolamide, awareness of this idiosyncratic reaction is crucial to avoid complications of acute angle-closure glaucoma.

Rapid and Reliable HLA-B*59:01 Genotyping to Prevent Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.

OBJECTIVE: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) are intraocular pressure-reducing medications used in ophthalmology. Human leukocyte antigen-B*59:01 (HLA-B*59:01) is strongly associated with CAI-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid and economical screening method for HLA-B*59:01 to prevent carbonic anhydrase inhibitor-induced SCARs. METHODS: Duplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with an internal control was performed for HLA-B*59:01 genotyping. The accuracy of duplex allele-specific PCR for HLA-B*59:01 genotyping was evaluated in 200 blood samples, using sequence-based typing (SBT) as the reference method. RESULTS: In total, 50 HLA-B*59:01-positive and 150 HLA-B*59:01-negative results obtained using duplex allele-specific PCR were in complete agreement with the SBT results. CONCLUSION: Duplex allele-specific PCR is a rapid, reliable, and economical assay for screening the HLA-B*59:01 allele.

Perianesthetic metabolic acidosis is associated with 2% dorzolamide eye drops in dogs that underwent ophthalmic surgery: a retrospective study (2019-2022).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the administration of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution in dogs undergoing ophthalmic surgery is associated with perianesthetic metabolic acidosis. ANIMALS: 60 dogs, with or without dorzolamide administration, underwent arterial blood gas analysis immediately after anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery between 2019 and 2022; a total of 60 surgeries were evaluated. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the administration of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution in dogs and the development of metabolic acidosis. Additionally, the influence of various potential risk factors, including age, body weight, sex, use of topical or systemic NSAIDs, and preoperative medications on the occurrence of metabolic acidosis, was evaluated. RESULTS: A significant association was found between the use of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution and perianesthetic metabolic acidosis (OR, 6.79; 95% CI, 2.00 to 23.02; P = .002). Furthermore, topical dorzolamide administration was significantly associated with both perianesthetic hypokalemia (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.11 to 11.20; P = .033) and perianesthetic hyperchloremia (OR, 9.25; 95% CI, 1.71 to 50.01; P = .010). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution is associated with perianesthetic metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, and hyperchloremia in dogs. It is prudent to be aware of these risks, especially before anesthesia.

Dural Venous Sinus Stent Placement Reduces Dosage Requirements for Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

This retrospective single-center study evaluated the change in required dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate before and after dural venous sinus stent placement (VSSP) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Adults diagnosed with IIH who failed optimized medical management and were treated with VSSP were included. This study comprised 55 patients who underwent VSSP for the diagnosis of IIH. The median preprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 1,000 mg (range, 500-4,000 mg) and 100 mg (range, 0-200 mg), respectively, among patients able to tolerate the medications. The median postprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 375 mg (range, 0-4,000 mg), with a mean reduction of 52.9% (P = .001), and 0 mg (range, 0-200 mg), with a mean reduction of 45.9% (P = .005), respectively. Dural VSSP significantly reduced dosage requirements for acetazolamide and/or topiramate, potentially reducing the morbidity secondary to medication side effects.

A Case of Acute Chest Pain After Acetazolamide to Treat Uncontrolled Increased Intraocular Pressure.

A 61-year-old man with uncontrolled increased intraocular pressure after cataract surgery was treated with acetazolamide. Three days later, he developed acute chest pain requiring emergency treatment. What would you do next?

Intravenous or Oral Acetazolamide for Treatment of Diuretic-Induced Alkalosis in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Acetazolamide has been used for diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis, but the preferred dose, route, and frequency of administration remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize dosing strategies and determine the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) acetazolamide for patients with heart failure (HF) with diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study comparing the use of IV versus PO acetazolamide in patients with HF receiving at least 120 mg of furosemide for the treatment of metabolic alkalosis (serum bicarbonate CO2 ≥32). The primary outcome was the change in CO2 on the first basic metabolic panel (BMP) within 24 hours of the first dose of acetazolamide. Secondary outcomes included laboratory outcomes, such as change in bicarbonate, chloride, and incidence of hyponatremia and hypokalemia. This study was approved by the local institutional review board. RESULTS: IV acetazolamide was given in 35 patients and PO acetazolamide was given in 35 patients. Patients in both groups were given a median of 500 mg of acetazolamide in the first 24 hours. For the primary outcome, there was a significant decrease in CO2 on the first BMP within 24 hours after patients received the IV acetazolamide (-2 [interquartile range, IQR: -2, 0] vs 0 [IQR: -3, 1], P = 0.047). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IV acetazolamide resulted in significantly decreased bicarbonate within 24 hours of administration. IV acetazolamide may be preferred to treat diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis in patients with HF.

Acetazolamide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Volume Overload.

BACKGROUND: Whether acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that reduces proximal tubular sodium reabsorption, can improve the efficiency of loop diuretics, potentially leading to more and faster decongestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload, is unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with acute decompensated heart failure, clinical signs of volume overload (i.e., edema, pleural effusion, or ascites), and an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of more than 1000 pg per milliliter or a B-type natriuretic peptide level of more than 250 pg per milliliter to receive either intravenous acetazolamide (500 mg once daily) or placebo added to standardized intravenous loop diuretics (at a dose equivalent to twice the oral maintenance dose). Randomization was stratified according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% or >40%). The primary end point was successful decongestion, defined as the absence of signs of volume overload, within 3 days after randomization and without an indication for escalation of decongestive therapy. Secondary end points included a composite of death from any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure during 3 months of follow-up. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 519 patients underwent randomization. Successful decongestion occurred in 108 of 256 patients (42.2%) in the acetazolamide group and in 79 of 259 (30.5%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17 to 1.82; P<0.001). Death from any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure occurred in 76 of 256 patients (29.7%) in the acetazolamide group and in 72 of 259 patients (27.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.48). Acetazolamide treatment was associated with higher cumulative urine output and natriuresis, findings consistent with better diuretic efficiency. The incidence of worsening kidney function, hypokalemia, hypotension, and adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of acetazolamide to loop diuretic therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure resulted in a greater incidence of successful decongestion. (Funded by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; ADVOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03505788.).

Acetazolamide: Old drug, new evidence?

Acetazolamide is an old drug used as an antiepileptic agent, amongst other indications. The drug is seldom used, primarily due to perceived poor efficacy and adverse events. Acetazolamide acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, of which there are several subtypes in humans. Acetazolamide causes an acidification of the intracellular and extracellular environments activating acid-sensing ion channels, and these may account for the anti-seizure effects of acetazolamide. Other potential mechanisms are modulation of neuroinflammation and attenuation of high-frequency oscillations. The overall effect increases the seizure threshold in critical structures such as the hippocampus. The evidence for its clinical efficacy was from 12 observational studies of 941 patients. The 50% responder rate was 49%, 20% of patients were rendered seizure-free, and 30% were noted to have had at least one adverse event. We conclude that the evidence from several observational studies may overestimate efficacy because they lack a comparator; hence, this drug would need further randomized placebo-controlled trials to assess effectiveness and harm.

Serious Adverse Events of Oral and Topical Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.

IMPORTANCE: Some ophthalmologists may be reluctant to prescribe oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, given the potential for life-threatening systemic adverse reactions. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-based analysis of the safety of oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in clinical care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This matched longitudinal cohort study took place in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive patients older than 65 years who were prescribed an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2020, were identified. Patients were matched 1-to-1 based on age, sex, and diabetes status. Time zero was defined as the date of the first identified prescription for the medication, and the primary analysis focused on the first 120 days of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was a severe complicated adverse event of either Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or aplastic anemia. RESULTS: Overall, 128 942 matched patients initiated an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor during the 25-year study period. The mean (SD) age was 75 (6.6) years, 71 958 (55.8%) were women, and 25 058 (19.4%) had a diagnosis of diabetes. The oral and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor groups had similar baseline demographics. Patients prescribed an oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor had an absolute risk of a severe complicated adverse event of 2.90 per 1000 patients, whereas patients prescribed a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor had an absolute risk of 2.08 per 1000 patients. This difference was equivalent to a risk ratio of 1.40, with a number needed to harm of 1 in 1220 patients (95% CI, 1.12-1.74; P = .003). This generally low risk was replicated in multivariable regression controlling for confounding factors. Additional risk factors for a severe complicated adverse event included patients with more comorbidities and those with more frequent clinic contacts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The risk of a serious adverse reaction following prescription of an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor was low and similar between agents. Given the low risk of severe adverse reactions, this population-level analysis supports reconsidering the reluctance toward prescribing an oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor.

Systemic side effects of glaucoma medications.

Glaucoma is a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells leading to visual field loss. Lowering intraocular pressure is currently the only modifiable risk factor to slow glaucoma progression. Intraocular pressure-lowering options include topical and systemic medications, lasers, and surgical procedures. Glaucoma eye drops play a major role in treating this blinding disease. Similar to all medications, the glaucoma medications have their own adverse effects. The majority of glaucoma medications work by stimulating or inhibiting adrenergic, cholinergic, and prostaglandin receptors, which are distributed all over the body. Therefore, the glaucoma medications can affect organs other than the eye. This review will discuss the systemic adverse effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, sympathomimetics, para-sympathomimetics, beta blockers, prostaglandin analogs, hyperosmotic agents, and novel glaucoma medications with a stress on pregnant patients, breastfeeding mothers, and paediatric patients.

Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension: A Spotlight on Imaging, the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, and COVID-19 Associated Cases.

Primary intracranial hypertension (PIH) is characterized by clinical signs of increased intracranial pressure, papilledema, elevated opening pressure, and absence of mass lesion, hydrocephalus, or meningeal enhancement on neuroimaging. Visual changes are a common presenting feature and if untreated there is risk of irreversible vision loss. There have been recent proposed changes to the criteria for PIH along with studies looking at the differences in imaging characteristics between adult and pediatric PIH. The presence of transverse sinus stenosis alone was highly sensitive and specific for pediatric PIH. The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial was an adult, multicenter study that examined the use of acetazolamide and weight loss on the course of PIH. The study confirmed many previously held beliefs including the most common presenting symptom in PIH is headache. Most patients present with bilateral papilledema with 58.2% of patients having symmetric Frisen scale grading and within one grade in 92.8%. Although diplopia is a common reported symptom, very few have evidence of cranial nerve palsy. Male gender, high-grade papilledema, and decreased visual acuity at presentation are risk factors for treatment failure. Acetazolamide use is associated with mild metabolic acidosis. During acetazolamide treatment, monitoring for hypokalemia or aplastic anemia is not recommended. Monitoring transaminases in the titration phase of treatment should be considered due to a case of transaminitis and pancreatitis with elevated lipase. Newer case reports have also seen associations of secondary intracranial hypertension with concurrent COVID-19 infection and MIS-C.

Novel cubosome based system for ocular delivery of acetazolamide.

Acetazolamide is the drug of choice for glaucoma treatment in an emergency. However, it is not available in any topical formulation and it is available only as systemic tablets. Despite its efficiency as a drug in decreasing intraocular pressure, it has negative systemic effects as renal toxicity and metabolic acidosis. Moreover, it suffers from poor aqueous solubility and low corneal permeability limiting its ocular bioavailability and its use topically. Cubosomes have enormous advantages as a drug delivery system, most importantly, high surface area, thermal stability, and ability to encapsulate hydrophobic, amhiphilic, and hydrophilic molecules. Herein, we have exploited the unique properties of cubosomes as a novel nano-delivery system for acetazolamide as eye drops dosage form for glaucoma treatment. Different acetazolamide-loaded cubosomes have been developed and evaluated. The best-optimized formulation (F5), was cubic shaped structure, with an average particle size of 359.5 ± 2.8 nm, surface charge -10.8 ± 3.2 mV, and 59.8% entrapment efficiency. Ex-vivo corneal permeation studies have revealed a 4-fold increase in acetazolamide permeability coefficient compared to that stated in the literature. F5 showed superior therapeutic efficacy represented by a 38.22% maximum decrease in intraocular pressure vs. 31.14 and 21.99% decrease for the commercial Azopt® eye drops and Cidamex® tablets, respectively. It also exhibited higher (AUC0-10) compared to Azopt® eye drops and Cidamex® tablets by 2.3 and 3 times, respectively. F5 showed mean residence time 4.22 h vs. 2.36 and 2.62 h for Azopt® and Cidamex® with no eye irritation observed according to the modified Draize test. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for developing acetazolamide-loaded cubosomes as the topical delivery system for glaucoma treatment.

Long-term efficacy and safety of dichlorphenamide for treatment of primary periodic paralysis.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Long-term efficacy and safety of dichlorphenamide (DCP) were characterized in patients with primary periodic paralysis (PPP). METHODS: Patients with PPP in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study were randomly assigned to receive DCP 50 mg twice daily or placebo for 9 weeks, followed by a 52-week open-label DCP treatment phase (DCP/DCP and placebo/DCP populations). Efficacy (attack rate, severity-weighted attack rate) and safety were assessed in patients completing the study (61 weeks). In this post hoc analysis, efficacy and safety data were pooled from hyperkalemic and hypokalemic substudies. RESULTS: Sixty-three adults (age, 19-76 years) completed the double-blind phase; 47 (74.6%) of these patients completed 61 weeks. There were median decreases in weekly attack and severity-weighted attack rates from baseline to week 61 (DCP/DCP [n = 25], -1.00 [P < .0001]; placebo/DCP [n = 20], -0.63 [P = .01] and DCP/DCP, -2.25 [P < .0001]; placebo/DCP, -1.69 [P = .01]). Relatively smaller median decreases in weekly attack and severity-weighted attack rates occurred from weeks 9 to 61 among patients receiving DCP continuously (n = 26; -0.14 [P = .1] and -0.24 [P = .09]) than among those switching from placebo to DCP after 9 weeks (n = 16; -1.04 [P = .049] and -2.72 [P = .08]). Common adverse events (AEs) were paresthesia and cognition-related events, which typically first occurred within 1 month of blinded treatment initiation and in rare cases led to treatment discontinuation. Dose reductions were frequently associated with common AE resolution. DISCUSSION: One-year open-label DCP treatment after a 9-week randomized, controlled study confirmed long-term DCP remains safe and effective for chronic use. Tolerability issues (paresthesia, cognition-related AEs) were manageable in most patients.

Oral acetazolamide for intraocular pressure lowering: balancing efficacy and safety in ophthalmic practice.

Introduction: Systemic acetazolamide is an efficacious adjunct to topical therapy to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucomatous eyes. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review for how best to use the agent in ophthalmic practice.Areas covered: This article will review the history, mechanism of action, methods of observing efficacy, indications for IOP lowering, side effects, allergy information including discussion of limited cross-reactivity between antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial sulfonamides, formulations, dosing and monitoring of acetazolamide. To select articles for this review, an electronic search was conducted using the PubMed database and cross-referencing was conducted for relevant literature.Expert opinion: The benefits of oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor therapy can outweigh the risks in many circumstances. It is important that eye care practitioners work together with a patient's primary care practitioner to monitor for and mitigate risks. Greater education is needed with regard to the allergy profile of these powerful agents. Though not often a first-line option, oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors remain pivotal and play in important role in delivery of eye care.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome secondary to acetazolamide associated with markedly elevated procalcitonin.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an important cause of multi-organ dysfunction and can mimic other disorders including sepsis. We describe a patient presenting with septic shock and accompanying high procalcitonin. Although initially treated empirically with antibiotics, the emergence of eosinophilia during the admission lead to a revised diagnosis of DRESS syndrome, presumed secondary to acetazolamide. This case highlights the importance of regular clinical assessment and re-evaluation is key in identifying emerging features such as eosinophilia, rash and organ dysfunction, which can secure the diagnosis. Furthermore, the case also highlights that acetazolamide may be a rare cause of DRESS syndrome.